Cash v. City of Cincinnati

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1981-06-10

Cited by 129 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Holmes, J. 1 — 1 In the Court of Appeals, the defendants predicated their assignments of error on the argument that the defect in the crosswalk, as alleged by plaintiff, was only a minor imperfection and, as such, was not actionable as a matter of law by plaintiff. In support of that argument, defendants cited prior Ohio case law, emphasizing Kimball v. Cincinnati (1953), <span class="cita…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.