Carter v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1983-09-14

Cited by 186 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW CLINTON, Judge. The State’s position, carefully expressed by her locally affected district attorney, is that “a Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to entertain unassigned error regardless of the fundamental nature of the error in question.”…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.