Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1949-03-11

Cited by 119 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CARTER, J. I dissent. I believe that that portion of the constitutional provision *589 on usury (Cal. Const., art. XX, § 22, third para.) which excepts certain kinds of lenders, such as personal property brokers, is inoperative under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.