Carlin v. Jemal

Decided 2009-12-29

Cited by 257 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Regardless of whether plaintiff is a “holder in due course” {see UCC 3-302), a mere “holder” (see UCC 1-201 [20]), or only an “assignee” or “transferee” (see National Bank of N. Am. v Flushing Natl. Bank, 72 AD2d 538 , 539 [1979]; Phoenix Global Ventures, LLC v Phoenix Hotel Assoc., Ltd., 10 Misc 3d 1066[A] ,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.