Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1975-10-15

Cited by 141 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

William B. Bbown, J. At the outset we direct our attention to the jurisdictional question presented by appellant’s second proposition of law, which reads: “Full compliance with Ohio Revised Code 5715.19 and 5715.13 is necessary to confer jurisdiction upon a county board of revision, notwithstanding that the complaint seeks an increase rather than a decrease of the taxable value of real estate. ’ ’</blo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.