California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1979-08-15

Cited by 227 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

NEWMAN, J. — I dissent. I have not been persuaded by either written or oral argument (1) that “section 453.5 was intended to apply to the instant circumstances” (maj. opn., ante, at p. 847), or (2) that the section superseded other pertinent statutes. I regret that, because of the court’s overload and ongoing proceedings of the Commission on Judicial Per…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.