Cadle Co. v. Lobingier

Decided 2001-06-21

Cited by 178 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION ON EN BANC REVIEW DAY, Justice. I.Introduction After reviewing David B. Lobingier’s motion for en banc review, we grant the motion in part and deny it in part. We withdraw our opinion and judgment of October 5, 2000 and substitute the following in their place. In this appeal, The Cadle Company (Ca-dl…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.