Business Communications, Inc. v. Banks

Decided 2012-06-21

Cited by 106 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

LAMAR, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part: ¶ 18. I agree that BCI is not entitled to compensatory damages and that the jury should not have been instructed on compensatory damages, as BCI conceded it suffered no actual damages due to the breach of the BPA. I also agree that BCI is entitled to nominal damages in this case. However, I must dissent to the majorit…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.