Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1932-02-23

Cited by 182 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*4 Mr. Chief Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the Court. This proceeding was brought for the redetermination of a deficiency in income tax for the year' 1923. The respondent, Chicago Portrait Company, is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business at Chicago. It o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.