Per Curiam. In this appeal, appellant contests only that portion of the court of appeals’ judgment affirming the disposition of the auto club pension and the insurance policy on appellee’s life. In her single proposition of law, appellant argues that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to award these assets to appellee without having ascertained their value. It is appellant’s contenti…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.