Brady v. Board of Review

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided 1997-12-22

Cited by 349 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

COLEMAN, J., dissenting. I would affirm the judgment below finding that claimants are eligible for unemployment benefits substantially for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division. General Motors’s communica *223 tions to its employees that the plant was closing were unequivocal and unyielding. It persisted in those communications until two days af…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.