Kline, J., dissenting. {¶ 31} I respectfully dissent. In my view, the trial court and the court of appeals did not err when they considered Susan Kirkland’s affidavit as admissible evidence because W LE presented sufficient evidence to establish that the affidavit met the Civ.R. 56(E) “personal knowledge” requirement. Kirkland’s description of her job duties allowed an inference that she would be in a posi…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.