Blon v. Bank One, Akron, N.A.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1988-02-10

Cited by 125 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Moyer, C.J. For the reasons that follow, we reverse, and reinstate summary judgment for Bank One. The first question presented by this appeal is whether, as a matter of law, Bank One had a duty to disclose the fee paid to West for arranging the Blons’ loan with Bank One under the federal Truth in Lending Act, Section 1601 et seq., Title 15, U.S. Code, and regulations promulgated thereunder in Part 22…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.