Block v. City of Los Angeles

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2001-06-06

Cited by 229 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur. The reason that I write separately is that section III(B) is unnecessary to the opinion and should be deleted. In section III(C) and (D), we hold that the Menkus declaration is not competent evidence, and without it, the city failed to establish a genuine issue of fact. 1 As we say in section III(D), “Even if we ignore those si…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.