Bivins v. State

Decided 1995-03-09

Cited by 207 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SHEPARD, Chief Justice, concurring in all but part 10. i Justice Dickson's opinion is a superb piece of work, and I join in just about all of it, as I join in the disposition. I part company, however, on the declaration that the Indiana Bill of Rights prohibits Reverend Radeliff's widow from saying a few words about the impact of Bivins' crime. I think Mrs. Radeliffs testimony was altogeth…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.