Binns v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1904-05-31

Cited by 115 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

'• Mr. Justice Brewer, after making the foregoing statement, (delivered the opinion of the court. The contention of plaintiff in error is • that. the. license, tax is an excise, that it is laid and collected “to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States,”-because by section 463 it is .provided that “all moneys re…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.