Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2003-06-27

Cited by 335 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I write separately because the majority’s expansive reasoning is irreconcilable with the Supreme Court’s decision in Rooker and unnecessarily enunciates a doctrine of “appellate jurisdiction” for Rooker-Feldman purposes that, as I explain below, is unwarranted on the facts of this case. I concur in the judgment, however, because…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.