Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & Kotkin

Decided 1998-09-15

Cited by 205 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PETERS, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I agree with part I of the majority opinion concerning the Lability of attorney Jane Seidl, one of the defendants, but I disagree with parts II and III concerning the LabiLty of the defendant law firm and the other individual defendants. 1 As a matter of principle, the majority opinion subscribes to the position advanced by the defendant…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.