Chief Justice Rehnquist, dissenting. This case arises because of two peculiar, if not unique, rules of Ohio law. The first is that even though a foreign corporation may be subject to process under the state “long- *899 arm” statute, it is nonetheless not “present” in the State for purposes of tolling the statute of limitations. The second is that a foreign…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.