Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1919-01-28

Cited by 589 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Cardozo, J. This case is here upon re-argument. We need not rehearse the facts. They are concisely stated in Judge Cuddeback’s opinion ( 223 N. Y. 294 ). We held then .that there could be no recov…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.