Beard v. Comm'r

Decided 1984-05-24

Cited by 340 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Chabot, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority’s holdings as to the following issues: (1) Petitioner’s wages are income, subject to tax, and he is not entitled to an offsetting deduction for "Non-taxable receipts”. (2) Petitioner intentionally disregarded respondent’s rules and regulations in claiming the un…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.