Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · Decided 1998-05-28

Cited by 346 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. This case arises from a reduction in force (“RIF”) instituted in 1993 by defendant Sea-gate Technology, Inc., a manufacturer of computer equipment. As a result of the RIF, more than 200 employees at Seagate’s Oklahoma City facility were laid off. Many of the laid-off employees had worked at the Oklahoma City facility for more than a decade. Some of the plaintiffs in this case had more than twenty year…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.