Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2007-12-28

Cited by 483 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Opinion by Judge MCKEOWN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BERZON. McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This appeal under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires us to consider the intersection of a safety-based qualification standard and the “business necessity” defense. United Parcel Service (UPS) imposes a Department of Transportation (DOT) hearing standard on all package-car drivers,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.