Barts v. Joyner

U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · Decided 1989-01-27

Cited by 140 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: Because the record demonstrates no violation of a clearly established constitutional right, we reverse, in part, the judgment of the district court in this action based on 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 ; and because the damages were not correctly limited, we vacate the remainder of the judgment and remand for a new trial on damages. Background</…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.