Bartling v. Fruehauf Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · Decided 1994-09-23

Cited by 125 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

AMENDED OPINION NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, 78 individual salaried non-bargaining unit employees of what used to be the SPECO Division of the Kelsey-Hayes Company (“Kelsey-Hayes”), brought this ERISA action against: Kelsey-Hayes; its parent, the Fruehauf Corporation (“Frue-hauf’); its former employee benefit pension plan (“Pension Plan”); the Retirement Plan administrator, the Retire…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.