Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1968-10-03

Cited by 168 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Dissenting Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Bell: Notwithstanding the interesting ramblings by the majority in the field which used to be the legal field of Workmen’s Compensation, but has now been changed by it to the field of human emotions and equities, it still ought to be the law in Workmen’s Compensation cases, as it is in the field of trespass and in other fields of the law, that the person who has t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.