Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD

Decided 1987-12-10

Cited by 127 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice. This is a legal malpractice action in which the trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants. The court of appeals reversed and allowed plaintiffs attorney’s fees on appeal. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners, <a href="/opinion/1220374/barmat-v-john-and-jane-doe-partners-ad/" ari…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.