Barham v. Barham

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1949-02-01

Cited by 127 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SCHAUER, J. I dissent. The majority opinion rests on the proposition that “The last amendment, though executed after the parties’ final divorce, does not mention a second marriage or remarriage, nor indicate that the ratification of the wording ‘resumption of former relations’ is to have any different connotation than it had as embraced in the preceding agreements r…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.