Bancroft & Masters, Inc., a California Corporation v. Augusta National Inc., a Georgia Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2000-08-18

Cited by 479 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SNEED, Circuit Judge, with whom TROTT, Circuit Judge, joins, Concurring: The “effects test” has normally been restricted to tortious conduct in which the “aimer” in state Y was seeking to injure wrongfully the target in state X. I concur in the opinion only on the assumption that Augusta National, through its letter to NSI, engaged in tortious conduct, i.e., that they intended to effect a conversion of t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.