Baker v. Goldsmith

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1979-05-23

Cited by 468 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

POPE, Justice, concurring. While I concur in the result, it is my view that we are unnecessarily confounding the trials of bill of review cases. I agree that the bill of review plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the pri- or judgment was rendered as a result of fraud, accident or wrongful act of the opposite party which was unmixed with any fault or negligence of his own or that ther…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.