Bair v. Peck

Decided 1991-05-24

Cited by 149 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Herd, J., dissenting: I am apprehensive about our step-by-step retreat from constitutional principles with a convenient technique of rationalizing equal protection and ignoring the required quid pro quo required as a substitute for a “remedy by due course of law.” Thus, our written constitution loses its meaning and affords no barrier to the enactment of unjust laws resulting from the transitory public pressures of the moment. Th…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.