Bailey v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1993-02-26

Cited by 180 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

LARSEN, Justice, concurring and dissenting. I concur, in part, in the result reached in the appeal of Clarence Bailey at No. 34 W.D. Appeal Docket 1987. Although I disagree that the cause of action accrued at the time *265 of the termination of the attorney-client relationship, I agree that appellant Bailey’s allegations o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.