Auge v. Auge

Decided 1983-06-03

Cited by 131 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

AMDAHL, Chief Justice. This is an appeal of a district court order denying appellant’s motions for an eviden-tiary hearing and for permission to remove the parties’ child from the State of Minnesota. Because denial of permission to remove effected a change in custody, and the applicable statute requires an evidentiary hearing before custody may be modified, we reverse and remand…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.