Atkins v. Parker

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1985-06-04

Cited by 376 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice Marshall, dissenting. I share Justice Brennan’s view that the logic of the relevant regulation, 7 CFR §273.12 (e)(2)(h) (1985), requires the sort of notice that the lower courts ordered here. The regulation contemplates a notice that allows families to “adjust household budgets” according to changes in benefit levels, *158</page-n…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.