Arrington v. New York Times Co.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1982-04-07

Cited by 222 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Jasen, Gabrielli and Jones, JJ. (concurring). We concur in result in this case but cannot accept what appears to us to be the overbreadth of Judge Fuchsberg’s opinion, addressing as it does plaintiff’s false light formulation which is not necessary for the resolution of this appeal. Chief Judge Cooke and Judge Meyer concur with Judge Fuchsberg; Judges Jasen, Gabrielli and Jones concur in result in a concurri…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.