Arnold v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1993-04-07

Cited by 221 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW McCORMICK, Presiding Judge. Appellants were convicted by a jury of the misdemeanor offense of disruptive activity on a university campus. V.T.C.A., Education Code, Section 4.30(a), (b)(2) (1972). The trial court assessed a fine of $200.00 for each appellant and imprisonment of three months for sev…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.