Armstrong v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1995-03-29

Cited by 174 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OVERSTREET, Judge, dissents with the following note: I suppose one could play on words as the majority apparently approves of to the infringement of an accused right to fair trial; however I refuse to do so. The facts of the voir dire proceeding are not in dispute and *374 well chronicled in the majority opinion and dissenting opinion. <p "b408-4"…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.