Armstrong v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1995-03-28

Cited by 116 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*376 OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Kaye. This libel action arises out of the past decade of insider trading scandals and Wall Street intrigue, when the media was filled with reports of arbitrageur Ivan Boesky’s stock schemes, investment banker Michael Milken’s deployment of junk…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.