Anthony N. Matteo v. Superintendent, Sci Albion the District Attorney of the County of Chester the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania

U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Decided 1999-03-24

Cited by 316 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BECKER, Chief Judge, concurring. I agree that the order of the District Court denying Matteo’s application for writ of habeas corpus should be affirmed, because, whether the interpretation of AEDPA applied by the majority or the one that I would apply is correct, the decision of the state court that Lubking was not a government agent at the time of the telephone calls and that the incriminating statements w…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.