Angleton v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1998-05-27

Cited by 279 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MEYERS, Judge, dissenting. I agree with the majority that there are problems with this Court’s opinion in Kep-hart. But having disavowed that opinion, we ought to remand this case to the Court of Appeals to reconsider the authenticity of the evidence. Rule of Criminal Evidence 901 provides in part: (a) General Provision. The requirement of authentication or ide…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.