Andrew Conley v. State of Indiana

Decided 2012-07-31

Cited by 388 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

RUCKER, J., dissenting. At the age of seventeen Andrew Conley murdered his ten-year-old brother. I *881 agree with the majority that Dr. Daum’s testimony was properly admitted and I do not believe the trial court manifestly abused its discretion in weighing aggravating and mitigating circumstances in this case. However, I do not agree Conley should have…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.