Anderson v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · Decided 2005-05-04

Cited by 220 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

GREGORY, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: Although I agree with most of the majority’s analysis, I write separately because I cannot concur in the disparate impact analysis contained in part VII(B). There, the majority affirms a grant of summary judgment against Ms. Anderson on her disparate impact claim despite the fact that she produced evidence showing a statistically significant variation between the numbe…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.