Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1991-05-30

Cited by 195 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MOSK, J., Concurring and Dissenting.—In my view the trial court properly granted a new trial and the Court of Appeal, in a thoughtful analysis of the law, correctly affirmed the order. I thus concur in the result. *1006 I must express my apprehension, however, that we are once again retreating from “[t]he pure concepts…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.