Almanza v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1985-02-27

Cited by 6,526 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ONION, Presiding Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Article 36.19, V.A.C.C.P., provides: “Whenever it appears by the record in any criminal action that any requirement of Articles 36.14, 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18 has been disregarded, the judgment shall not be reversed unless the error appearing from the record was calculated to…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.