MACK, Associate Judge, dissenting: The majority’s position, stated simply, is that in ruling on Allen’s direct appeal a division of this court did consider Allen’s claim that two of the offenses charged in the indictment merged, 1 and rejected this claim, finding no plain error. The court also holds that even if the division had not considered this issue, Allen would have been forec…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.