Alford v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California · Decided 2003-02-27

Cited by 189 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BAXTER, J., Concurring and Dissenting, I concur fully with the lead opinion insofar as it requires a protective order barring use of Pitchess 1 information in any “court proceeding” besides the one in which discovery was ordered. (Evid. Code, § 1045, subd. (e).) The statutory scheme denies participants in other actions privileged information where such inf…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.