Alejandre v. Bull

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2007-03-01

Cited by 102 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

¶38 (concurring in result) — I agree with the majority in result but write separately to suggest a different analytical approach to the economic loss rule. Chambers, J. f 39 Like the majority, I would reject Arturo and Norma Alejandre’s negligent misrepresentation claim. Once the economic loss rule is applied, this negligent misrepresentation claim is revealed to be a breach of contract claim, not re…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.