Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States

Decided 1981-06-17

Cited by 138 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

DAVIS, Judge, concurring in the result in part and dissenting in part: Though I do not join the court’s opinion, I agree with its conclusion that plaintiffs have not shown themselves entitled to monetary relief from the general funds of the Treasury which are necessarily involved in any suit here under the Tucker Act — and I accept much of the opinion’s reasoning to tha…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.