Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pitrolo

Decided 1986-03-13

Cited by 213 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MILLER, Chief Justice: The principal issue in this appeal involves the amount of attorney’s fees that should be awarded to an insured’s attorney who represented the insured after the insurer denied coverage. The case below was a declaratory judgment action filed in the Circuit Court of Marion County by the Aetna Casualty Surety Company against Paul Pi…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.