Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · Decided 1998-05-18

Cited by 2,750 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

¡BRISCOE, Circuit Judge, concurring and dissenting: I agree with the majority’s disposition of the outrageous conduct claim, but respectfully dissent from its affirmance of summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart on Adler’s Title VII sexual harassment claim. There is substantial support in the record for Adler’s claim that she was subjected to continuous < citation-in…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.